ANDROLOGY - Original Article

Vol. 49 No. 4 (2023): Urology Research and Practice

Management of Priapism: Results of a Nationwide Survey and Comparison with International Guidelines

Main Article Content

Mustafa Koray Kirdag
Isa Ozbey
Eser Ordek
Ahmet Olgun
Mehmet Sezai Ogras
Serkan Gonultas
Emrah Kucuk
Burak Koseoglu
Yigit Cagri Kizilcay
Mehmet Sarier
Ozgur Kazan
Coskun Kaya
Kadir Karkin
Ahmet Karakeci
Tumay Ipekci
Abdurrahman Inkaya
Muhammed Arif Ibis
Muhammet Guzelsoy
Kadir Yildirim
Ates Kadioglu
Jean de la Rosette
Cem Nedim Yuceturk
Mehmet Ozgur Yucel
Ahmet Yuce
Mehmet Yoldas
Sercan Yilmaz
Kemal Yilmaz
Abdullah Gül
İbrahim Hacıbey
Selim Yazar
Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan
Mehmet Yigit Yalcin
Tuncay Toprak
Ahmet Tahra
Samet Senel
Ugur Balci
Utku Can
Kerem Bursali
Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt
Can Benlioglu
Omer Bayrak
Numan Baydilli
Yavuz Bastug
Caner Baran
Seref Coser
Murat Aydos
Memduh Aydin
Huseyin Kursad Avci
Ahmet Asfuroglu
Seyhmuz Araz
Erdogan Aglamis
Mine Guvel
Salih Zeki Sönmez
Murat Dursun
Cem Tugrul Gezmis
Onur Fikri
Anil Erkan
Ismail Emre Ergin
Giray Ergin
Mithat Eksi
Berk Yasin Ekenci
Erhan Demirelli
Arif Kalkanli
Huseyin Cihan Demirel
Murat Demir
Demirhan Orsan Demir
Nusret Can Cilesiz
Ali Cift
Gokhan Calik
Mehmet Caglar Cakici

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate current urologic practice regarding the management of priapism in Turkey and compare with international guidelines.



Methods: Urologists and urology residents were invited to an online survey consisting of 30 multiple-choice questions on priapism-related clinical practices that were consid- ered most important and relevant to practices by using Google Forms.



Results: Total number of responses was 340. Respondents reported that they recorded a detailed patient’s medical history and physical examination findings (n = 340, 100%) and laboratory testing, which includes corporal blood gas analysis (n=323, 95%). Participants announced that they performed Doppler ultrasound for 1/4 cases (n = 106, 31%), but 22% of the participants (n=75) replied that they performed in >75% of cases. Participants (n=311, 91%) responded that the first-line treatment of ischemic priapism is decompression of the corpus cavernosum. Moreover, most respondents (n = 320, 94%) stated that sympathomimetic injection drugs should be applied as the second step. About three-quarters of respondents (n = 247, 73%) indicated adrenaline as their drug of choice. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors seems to be the most pre- ferred drug for stuttering priapism (n=141, 41%). Participants (n=284, 84%) replied that corpora-glanular shunts should be preferred as the first. A large number of par- ticipants (n = 239, 70%) declared that magnetic resonance imaging can be performed in cases with delayed (>24 hours) priapism to diagnose corporal necrosis. Most of the participants (84%) responded that penile prosthesis should be preferred to shunts in cases with delayed (>48 hours) priapism.



Conclusion: It would be appropriate to improve the training offered by professional associations and to give more training time to the management of priapism during residency.



Cite this article as: Kalkanli A, Zeki Sönmez S, Guvel M, et al. Management of priapism: Results of a nationwide survey and comparison with international guidelines. Urol Res Pract. 2023;49(4):225-232.


Article Details