Original Article

Vol. 44 No. 4 (2018): Urology Research and Practice

Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy

Main Article Content

Daniar K. Osmonov
Amr A. Faddan
Alexey V. Aksenov
Carsten M. Naumann
Leonid M. Rapoport
Evgeny A. Bezrukov
Dmitry G. Tsarichenko2
Klaus P. Jünemann

Abstract

Abstract


 



Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) is defined as infection at or near surgical incisions within 30 days of an operative procedure and classified either incisional superficial and deep or organ/space. The aim of the study is to report and compare the incidence and management of SSIs after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP).





Material and methods: Within the last 4 years, we identified 285 patients that underwent RRP, n=187 (66%) or RALP, n=98 (34%). We reviewed the frequency, types and way of management of SSI complications.





Results: A significant difference was found between RALP and RRP (2/98, 2% vs. 27/187, 14.4%; p<0.0001) as for SSIs. The time interval between the time of surgery and diagnosis of SSIs was longer in RALP relative to RRP (median 13.5 vs. 12.9 days, p=0.761).





Conclusion: All types of SSIs could be developed after RP, however RALP patients only experienced organ or space SSIs and have a lower rate of SSIs and shorter treatment time.





Cite this article as: Osmonov DK, Faddan AA, Aksenov AV, Naumann CM, Rapoport LM, Bezrukov EA, et al. Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy. Turk J Urol 2018; 44: 303-10.

Article Details